View Single Post

Old 09-26-2008, 07:41 PM   #41 (permalink)
Deg™
Love me gently with a chainsaw
Administrator

Inquisitor
 
Deg™'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,080
Deg™ is a name known to allDeg™ is a name known to allDeg™ is a name known to allDeg™ is a name known to allDeg™ is a name known to all
Send a message via AIM to Deg™ Send a message via Skype™ to Deg™
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Akazukin View Post
Hi, I have a comment, not good at writing but I'm trying.

I have studied Iraq's history. Saddam Hussein Took power by killing his rivals. Iraq doesn't hold good weapons, but the large amount of people gave it an advantage.

After that, Iraq attacks Iran. After a long battle, Iraq suffers economic problems. Iraq then attacks Kuwat, a place with large oil supplies. Finally, Iraq claims that Kuwat is no longer kuwat, and claims that the oil factory all belonged to Iraq.

The UN (20+ countries alliance), completely disagree, probably because that oil factory is also part of their economy.They attack back, resulted in the gulf war. It's actually a sure-win, Iraq's gunboat vs those high tech weapons.

Later, Iraq builts OSIRAK in 1970s , a facility to research on nuclear weapons.
Osirak - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Israeli have bomb that facility with aircraft.

After that, US president received warnings that he will be killed, and terrorist treats. He then order US troops to search for nuclear weapons in Iraq. He found noting.

Finally, people began to think that it's the government who wants to gain access to the oil factory, and they plotted a fake terrorist attack. However, History should be able to prove that the US still have a reason to search for nuclear weapons even without 9/11.
Strangely, i agree with you. Claiming 9/11 as an 'excuse' to start a war is bull****; we had more than enough reasons to attack Iraq and Afghanistan anyway.
__________________
Deg™ 15 0FF11|\|3   Reply With Quote