

![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
| Starcraft II Discussion Discussion pertaining to the upcoming title from Blizzard Entertainment, Starcraft II. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
![]() ![]() Deviant Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 125
![]() |
After seeing some videos about starcraft 2 I relies that it will suck harder than broodwar.
GRAPHIC - this is warcraft in space. Or cartoon in space. The units are big as hell and take up a large portion of the screen. Exactly like warcraft. now with a twist. The attacks will fill the hole screen with fancy colors too. This make macro harder. Whats up with the attacks? If you look at them you will see many colors all of a sudden, and a lot of blinking, static light, even the units being attacked activates counter measures shields etc and their very own attack full of bright colors. This can give epilepsy to the guys who play long days. The buildings looks bad also, Like toys. who honestly feels that the siege tank looks like a "tank" in sc2? To be honest. It looks like craaaaaaaaaaaaaaaap. check the nice video down here if you haven't seen starcraft 2 in action. I will still buy the game thou, but I really think the graphic designer should get a kick in the butt for making the game hard on people with epilepsy and making Terran look like toy soldiers. And for being lazy and steal the looks from warcraft. Other than graphic the game looks slower. And we can only hope the units don't behave as in warcraft3, warcraft3 is failure as strategy game, works good as UMS thou since it got heroes. But the graphic there sucks. And toys don't fit in a space environment. neither does slow moving units and low unitcap. (I dont know the unit cap, but with the new graphic it will probebly be lover than 200) And the "mothership", how many units will that count as. 10-16? this probebly isnt any news to anyone, but I feelt for sharing my thoughts. YouTube - starcraft2 |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
down with 24kazukin
Senior Member
Gold Member ![]() ![]() Saint |
Quote:
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Put a smile on that Face!
Senior Member
Gold Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Crusader |
The graphics are dead sexy in comparison to most modern RTS's. Your a moron, as they won't significantly hinder any macroing, or even microing for that matter.
Details and dead sexy looks are what keep the computer platform rely on for market, as consoles have all but taken over the gaming market. The only thing we have left is our ability to render better looking graphics. I don't even know how you can compare it to Warcraft tho, Warcraft is like 6 years old and looks like ****. The only qualm I have with SC2 is that it will be hard to get used to, as it will be very veyr differant. This could be good or bad, I guess we'll find out.
__________________
![]() ![]() You either die a hero or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain. |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Banned
![]() ![]() Deviant Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 92
![]() |
Yeah his a moron. >.> Let him state his opinion. I do like the graphics, but I think it's getting a bit too fancy with them. And all the new high-res technology may require new computers for some that can handle SC, but not SC2. But anyhow, I think SC2 is gonna be awesome.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
![]() ![]() Deviant Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 61
![]() |
Blizzard could be doing more to improve their graphics. I am going to wait to buy starcraft, see what every one says about it. If they say its good, I'll buy it.
__________________
Last edited by hellinsect : 07-08-2008 at 06:02 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |